The rest of the chapter discusses options for dealing with branching by feature. While there is a philosophical difference between this and the basic plan, as far as implementation is concerned there really isn’t really much difference.
#Youtube microsoft team foundation server code#
Code in the test branch is then promoted to the production branch when it is deemed ready. Instead developers work entirely in main, pushing updated to the test branch whenever they feel the code is stable enough. This plan does away with the idea of individual development and release branches. The final release-side branching strategy discussed in Microsoft’s guide is the “Code Promotion Plan”. This document explains how that extra branch will change your workflows in the section titled “Advanced Branch Plan”. However, if hotfixes are a regular occurrence then it may be preferable to create a separate branch specifically for them. When necessary, emergency hotfixes can be applied to directly to the release branch and then migrate back to the main branch. Since the branch is read-only, it is also useful when compliance requirements necessitate a true and accurate snapshot of production being maintained. At the same time, the actual release branch is created from its service pack branch and is marked read-only. Under this plan a service pack branch is created for each major release.
If you support multiple versions of an application, and those versions are occasionally updated via service packs then they recommend what they call the “standard plan”. They call this their “basic plan” and it makes sense for continuous deployment scenarios where you don’t need to work on more than one version at a time. The simplest is to just have a branch literally called “RELEASE”. The theory is that if you only increment the version number in the main branch you can tell at a glance how long it has been since the development branch was last re-synced with its parent.įor the release branches, Microsoft offers several options. One specific recommendation remains from previous versions of the guide, Microsoft continues to advocate not incrementing version numbers in development branches. The initial guidance for the development branches are fairly light, as it often comes down to how your company organizes its teams and features. There are two principal sets of branches coming off of MAIN, known as DEVELOPMENT and RELEASE. Known as the “trunk” to many, Microsoft refers to it as MAIN. Like most branching and merging guides, there is a main branch that serves as parent to all of the other branches. While ostensibly meant for TFS users, much of the advice is applicable no matter which source control provider you choose. Any help you can provide would be appreciated.Microsoft has released a draft of their new Branching and Merging Guide. I'm fine with either approach, but would like to get one to work. WorkItemStore WIS = (WorkItemStore)tpc.GetService(typeof(WorkItemStore))
TfsTeamProjectCollection tpc = TfsTeamProjectCollectionFactory.GetTeamProjectCollection(tfsUri) If I try to get the WIS from the team project collection, it throws an exception saying the server returned a 404 error.
WorkItemStore workItemStore = (WorkItemStore)projectCollection.GetService(typeof(WorkItemStore)) TfsConfigurationServer configurationServer = TfsConfigurationServerFactory.GetConfigurationServer(tfsUri) I also saw another post saying this was not the correct way to do this. I saw in a forum that this is due to missing assemblies, but there is no indication of what I'm missing. If I try to get the WIS from the config server, I get a null reference back. I've seen two different examples for getting to the WIS, but neither works. I'm trying to retrieve a stored query from our TFS server, but I'm running into difficulties getting the WorkItemStore.
0 kommentar(er)
