- MAC OS X NTFS WRITE SNOW LEOPARD HOW TO
- MAC OS X NTFS WRITE SNOW LEOPARD UPGRADE
- MAC OS X NTFS WRITE SNOW LEOPARD CODE
However, NTFS is MS Intellectual property and MS probably won't be giving up the code to it anytime soon. NTFS is far from primative or old in terms of features, as it has been the File System to live up to or beat outside of Microsoft. It still is young and lacks inherent encryption, file level quota management, and other little features, but with some good support will be a good alternative to NTFS in the UNIX world. ZFS is good and finally steps up to the plate on some important and modern File System features long needed. (Vista has a low I/O priority added to the inherent NTFS priority abilities, making backgroun operations like defragmenting seamless in terms of performance to the user.) There is nothing hard or special about this. OS X runs a background defragmentation utility, just like Vista does. When/if Apple adds ZFS to OS X, its inherent level of fragmentation will be equal to NTFS, because it is the nature of the File System design features of both that prevent this trade off for more advanced features.Īlso, people do realize that NO FS is fragmentation free, even the current mainstream file systems in OS X, right? This means it can get the file locations and read it in a swipe, even if it is in 1000 fragments.ģ) Microsoft has always stated snapshot and copy on write features of NTFS would mean it will always have a bit more fragmentation than 'simpilier' file systems, like OS X and most default Linux installs use today.
MAC OS X NTFS WRITE SNOW LEOPARD UPGRADE
Whoops, guess you should be making fun of something you are getting as an UPGRADE in terms of features.ġ) Microsoft never said NTFS didn't fragment, they said it was less prone to fragmenting that DOS's FAT/FAT32, which is TRUE.Ģ) Microsoft did state NTFS's fragmentation was not as great of a performance issue compared to FAT/FAT32 because of how NTFS's lookup behavior works, making no additional fragmentatin lookup seeks, like FAT does. This feature (snapshots/copy on write) is a MAIN FEATURE of ZFS, so if OS X moves to ZFS, it will have the same inherent added fragmentation as NTFS.
NTFS has copy of write and snapshot features, this adds to the fragmentation on a volume by the nature of the way snapshots and copy on write operations are handled. Does the poster know why NTFS will fragment a bit more than older File System technologies? Apparently No. There are important reasoning to the technology of NTFS, especially in terms of performance and features just not currently found in ANY OTHER File System made, and this even includes ZFS, that gets close.īack to the myth. If you want 'technical' information, go freaking read the NTFS whitepapers, or even get a academic code release version of how and why it works WITH SOURCE code. And even with that said, ZFS, still lacks several important features that is just expected to be there by people using NTFS.Ĭan't believe I'm going to use quick Wiki here. NTFS may be a bit long in the tooth, but it has taken 15 years and ZFS to catch up to NTFS on a number of features. Ok, this misinformed Bumpersticker logic has to stop, and now. What is NTFS? Is that that primitive file system that needs defragging all the time and takes forever to format a HD with that file system? You might as well ask about Zune support in Itunes. But fuck, don't ask about NTFS when this kind of thing is being annouced. On the other hand the one person we know not to scoff at when he says he's going to make something complex really simple, retain 99% of it's power, and deliver it ubiquitously and accessibly is Jobs/Apple. That's earthshaking if it could be done next year! Now a lot of people have blunted there spears chargin at this one so one needs a healthy dose of skepticism that it could be accomplished in a decade let alone in a few months.
MAC OS X NTFS WRITE SNOW LEOPARD HOW TO
We will be talking about the future of computing which is how to tame and unify alternative and multicore architectures in a way the programmer does not need to worry about. But apple's doing fine with it's cash flow and we won't be talking about NTFS 5 years from now. Yeah NTFS might sell a few enterprise computers. Then I read posts about "well what about NTFS or Power PC". Oh and one more thing, we've already done it and it's going to be in our next release And he's going to make this all in the core of the OS so it will be ubiquitous. Jobs announces he's going to enormously simplify the morass of parallel programming and then also take GPU programming languages far beyond NVIDIA.
0 kommentar(er)
